Freddy Lopez-Aguilar v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 15, 202217-72005California1,061 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDDY LOPEZ-AGUILAR, No. 17-72005

Petitioner, Agency No. A028-778-268

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and O’SCANNLAIN and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Freddy Lopez-Aguilar petitions for review of the decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which denied his motion to reopen. Lopez-Aguilar

argues that he was denied due process during his deportation proceeding. Lopez-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Aguilar also argues that the BIA abused its discretion when it declined to reopen his

case because the BIA failed adequately to consider changed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.