United States v. Pablo Hernandez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 202221-50016California1,037 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50016

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00662-ODW-5 v.

PABLO VELASCO HERNANDEZ, AKA MEMORANDUM*

Pablo Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN,*** District Judge.

Defendant Pablo Hernandez appeals his 87-month prison sentence arising

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. from his guilty plea to a racketeering conspiracy charge, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.