Kuldeep Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 202221-70577California746 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 16 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KULDEEP SINGH, No. 21-70577

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-177-522

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. Kuldeep Singh seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from his final order of removal to India.

The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.