Jose Ortiz Narez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 202219-72039California1,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ANTONIO ORTIZ NAREZ, Nos. 19-72039 20-71416 Petitioner, Agency No. A013-623-921 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Jose Ortiz Narez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying his appeal of the final order of

removal and his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and

deny in part and dismiss in part.

1. The record establishes Ortiz’s conviction under California Penal Code

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. (CPC) § 237d. The BIA held that the Immigration Judge (IJ) properly found that the

minute order, when read in conjunction with the statute, reflects that Ortiz…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.