John Rogers v. Lyft, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 202220-15689California371 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 16 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN ROGERS; et al., No. 20-15689

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01938-VC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LYFT, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,*** S. R. THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s decision to compel arbitration and

dismiss the arbitrable claims. We affirm. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

U.S.C. § 1291. See also Johnmohammadi v. Bloomingdale’s, Inc.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.