Amran Ahmed v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 202215-73416California561 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 16 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMRAN AHMED, No. 15-73416
Petitioner, Agency No. A208-118-571
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney Gen- eral,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 14, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL,*** Dis- trict Judge.
Amran Ahmed, a native of Bangladesh, petitions for review of a Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying his application for asylum and for relief
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Although Ahmed sought withhold-
ing of…