Amran Ahmed v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 202215-73416California561 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMRAN AHMED, No. 15-73416

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-118-571

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney Gen- eral,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL,*** Dis- trict Judge.

Amran Ahmed, a native of Bangladesh, petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying his application for asylum and for relief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Although Ahmed sought withhold-

ing of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.