Alonso Castaneda-Andrade v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 202220-71760California600 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FEB 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ALONSO CASTANEDA-ANDRADE, No. 20-71760 AKA Alonso Andrade Castaneda, Agency No. A056-800-639 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Alonso Castaneda-Andrade petitions for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ)

denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and request for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition in part and dismiss it in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.