In re Vinson CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 2022B313583MCalifornia2,482 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 2/16/22 In re Vinson CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

In re B313583

TOM LOVE VINSON (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA083837) on Habeas Corpus.

ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION

(NO CHANGE IN THE

APPELLATE JUDGMENT)

THE COURT:

The above-entitled opinion filed on February 10, 2022 is modified as follows:

On page 1, paragraph 2, delete “Fay Arfa, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petitioner” and replace it with “Fay Arfa for Petitioner.” There is no change in the appellate judgment.

_______________________________________________________

PERLUSS, P. J. SEGAL, J. FEUER, J.

2 Filed 2/10/22 In re Vinson CA2/7 (unmodified opinion)

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.