Hogan

Hogan v. DeAngelis Construction CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 2022A157615MCalifornia1,692 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 2/17/22 Hogan v. DeAngelis Construction CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

RONALD HOGAN, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

A157615

v. DEANGELIS CONSTRUCTION, (Sonoma County INC., et al., Super. Ct. No. SCV230846)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

AND DENYING REHEARING

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 28, 2022, be modified as follows: In the second line on page 5, the following should be added after the sentence ending with “bond costs were improper in this case”: “The Hogans note that, when the developers accepted rescission of the contract to purchase the Gardenview property, the developers agreed to pay ‘all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.