Yolanda Banks-Reed v. Joseph Mateu, III

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202219-17444California2,359 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YOLANDA BANKS-REED, individually; et Nos. 19-17444 al., 20-17085

Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-05755-YGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOSEPH MATEU III, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, a municipal corporation; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: WALLACE and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,** District

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Judge.

Bay Area Rapid Transit police officer Joseph Mateu III appeals from the

district court’s denial of his post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law,

arguing that the jury’s determinations that Sahleem…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.