Xiaoxue Huang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202216-70040California863 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIAOXUE HUANG, No. 16-70040

Petitioner, Agency No. A201-192-229

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN,*** District Judge.

Xiaoxue Huang, a native and citizen of China, petitions this court for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal.

“When the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.