United States v. Karl Cox

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202220-30211California825 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 17 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30211

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 5:09-cr-00001-TMB-MMS-1 v. 5:09-cr-00001-TMB-MMS

KARL LEROY COX,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 10, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: BYBEE, BEA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Karl Cox pleaded guilty to distributing child pornography, in violation of

U.S.C. §§ 2252(a)(2) and (b)(1). He appeals three of his special conditions of

supervised release that the district court imposed following multiple violations of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.