United States v. David Woods

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202221-50011California1,054 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50011

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:87-cr-00085-PA-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAVID ALLEN WOODS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. Federal prisoner David Woods appeals from the district court’s judgment

revoking his probation and the sentence imposed upon revocation. As the parties

are familiar with the facts, we do not recount…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.