United States v. Charles Williams

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202221-30068California306 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 21-30068 21-30069 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:07-cr-00380-RSM-1 v. 2:07-cr-00426-RSM-

CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Charles James Williams appeals from the

district court’s judgments revoking supervised release and challenges the 24-month

concurrent sentences imposed. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), Williams’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.