Smita Sanghvi v. County of San Bernardino

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202221-55422California890 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-55422 SMITA SANGHVI and MOUNTAIN VIEW CENTERS, INC., D.C. No. CV-20-11437-PA-JC

Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a municipal corporation; et. al.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. Smita Sanghvi and Mountain View Centers, Inc. (collectively, “Appellants”),

appeal a district court order granting a motion to dismiss filed by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.