Dos
Sigifredo Quezada Ibarra v. Dos
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202221-55271California769 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SIGIFREDO QUEZADA IBARRA; No. 21-55271
JASMIN QUEZADA-PENA,
D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:20-cv-01909-FMO-DFM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
STATE; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 13, 2022 Pasadena, California
Before: RAWLINSON and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,** District Judge.
Plaintiffs Sigifredo Quezada Ibarra and Jasmin Quezada-Pena challenge the
Department of State’s policy of refusing to apply the so-called “minor exception”
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Page 2 of
found at 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(B)(iii)(I) to those found inadmissible under