Dos

Sigifredo Quezada Ibarra v. Dos

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202221-55271California769 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SIGIFREDO QUEZADA IBARRA; No. 21-55271

JASMIN QUEZADA-PENA,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:20-cv-01909-FMO-DFM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

STATE; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,** District Judge.

Plaintiffs Sigifredo Quezada Ibarra and Jasmin Quezada-Pena challenge the

Department of State’s policy of refusing to apply the so-called “minor exception”

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Page 2 of

found at 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(B)(iii)(I) to those found inadmissible under

U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.