Robert Amster, M.D. v. Hoag Mem. Hosp. Presbyterian

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202221-55452California999 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: HOAG URGENT CARE-TUSTIN, No. 21-55452

INC.,

D.C. Nos. 8:19-cv-02343-MWF Debtor, 8:20-cv-00510-MWF ______________________________ 8:20-cv-00511-MWF 8:20-cv-00512-MWF ROBERT AMSTER, M.D.; et al.,

Appellants, MEMORANDUM*

v.

HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

PRESBYTERIAN; NEWPORT

HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ,*** District Judge.

Dr. Robert Amster, Robert Amster, M.D., Inc., and Your Neighborhood

Urgent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.