Liqiang Yang v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202220-73675California636 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LIQIANG YANG, No. 20-73675
Petitioner, Agency No. A208-429-602
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 15, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL,*** District Judge.
Petitioner Liqiang Yang seeks review of a decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal of a decision by an
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. immigration judge (“IJ”) denying his application for asylum. Although the IJ also
denied petitioner’s…