Gregorio Ventura-Flores v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 17, 202219-71179California1,037 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORIO CORAZON VENTURA- No. 19-71179 FLORES, AKA Flores Genaro Alejandro, AKA Jorge Flores, Agency No. A208-308-144

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and ADELMAN,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Gregorio Corazon Ventura-Flores seeks review of a decision by

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation. the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s

denial of his application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.