Ramirez

Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 2022B309408California8,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

Willhite, J.

Filed 2/18/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

ANGELICA RAMIREZ, B309408

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV25987) v.

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS,

INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Los Angeles County Superior Court. David J. Cowan, Judge. Affirmed. Hill, Farrer & Burrill, James A. Bowles and Casey L. Morris for Defendant and Appellant. Panitz Law Group and Eric A. Panitz for Plaintiff and Respondent. Plaintiff Angelica Ramirez and defendant Charter Communications, Inc. (Charter) are parties to an arbitration agreement. After Charter terminated Ramirez’s employment, Ramirez filed suit alleging claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, § 12940, et. seq.; FEHA)1 against Charter, and Charter filed a motion to compel arbitration. Finding the arbitration agreement unconscionable, the trial court denied Charter’s motion, and Charter appealed. On appeal, Charter contends the trial court erred in concluding the arbitration agreement is unconscionable and in refusing to sever any provisions the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.