United States v. Esteban Parra-Reyes
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202221-10158California261 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10158
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:20-cr-00432-SRB-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ESTEBAN PARRA-REYES,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Esteban Parra-Reyes appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for reentry of a
removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Parra-Reyes’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). no grounds for relief, along with a motion to…