Shikeb Saddozai v. Carlos Bolanos

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202220-17488California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHIKEB SADDOZAI, No. 20-17488

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-04511-BLF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CARLOS G. BOLANOS, Sheriff;

MAGUIRE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY;

SCOTT KIRKPATRICK; SAN MATEO

COUNTY JAIL; CORRECTIONAL

HEALTH SERVICES; AMANDA, Nurse Practitioner, San Mateo County Jail; SPENCER, Physician, San Mateo County Jail; SHERIFF OF SAN MATEO; THE

CITY OF REDWOOD CITY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). California state prisoner Shikeb Saddozai appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.