Arqueza

Shikeb Saddozai v. Arqueza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202220-16660California348 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHIKEB SADDOZAI, No. 20-16660

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-cv-03972-BLF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ARQUEZA, Deputy Sheriff; SAN MATEO

COUNTY SHERIFF; CITY OF REDWOOD

CITY,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

CARLOS G. BOLANOS; SCOTT

KIRKPATRICK; SERVICE LEAGUE

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO; MAGUIRE

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY OF SAN

MATEO COUNTY; CAMPOS; BOOTS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Shikeb Saddozai appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C § 1983 action alleging violation of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.