Romulo Flores v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202219-72559California1,518 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROMULO FLORES, AKA X. Cesar, AKA No. 19-72559 Pomulo Flores, AKA Romulfo Hidalgo Flores, AKA Romulo Flores-Hidalgo, AKA Agency No. A094-160-589 Romulo Floreshidalgo, AKA Cesar Florez, AKA Cesar Marcos Florez, AKA Marcos Florez, AKA Francisco Garcia, AKA MEMORANDUM* Romulfo F. Hidalgo, AKA Romulfo Flores Hidalgo, AKA Romulo Flores Hildago,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and submitted February 9, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Romulo Flores seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding him

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. competent to represent himself in removal proceedings and a prior decision

denying his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.