Qing Zhang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202220-72299California949 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QING ZHANG, No. 20-72299

Petitioner, Agency No. A098-753-756

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN,*** District Judge.

Qing Zhang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China

(“China”), petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Zhang’s petition to

remove the conditions on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.