Neo4j, Inc. v. Purethink, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202221-16029California726 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEO4J, INC.; NEO4J SWEDEN AB, No. 21-16029

Plaintiffs-counter- D.C. No. 5:18-cv-07182-EJD defendants-Appellees,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PURETHINK, LLC; IGOV, INC.; JOHN

MARK SUHY,

Defendants-counter- claimants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 7, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,** District Judge.

Neo4j, Inc. (“Neo4j USA”) sued John Mark Suhy and three corporations,

PureThink, LLC, iGov, Inc., and Graph Foundation, Inc. (collectively,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. “Defendants”), asserting claims under the Lanham…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.