Julio Huerta-Carillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202216-73724California408 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CESAR HUERTA-CARILLO, No. 16-73724

Petitioner, Agency No. A092-474-925

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and GLEASON,*** District Judge.

Julio Huerta-Carillo petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) decision denying his motion for sua sponte reopening based on a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sharon L. Gleason, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. fundamental change in the law. We generally lack jurisdiction to review the denial

of a sua sponte…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.