Jehan Mir v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202220-56403California512 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEHAN ZEB MIR, M.D., No. 20-56403

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-03960-SVW-SK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Jehan Zeb Mir, M.D., appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his action alleging federal and state law claims stemming from denial

of Mir’s insurance claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Hernandez v. Spacelabs Med. Inc., 343 F.3d 1107, 1112 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2003).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.