Francisco Noriega-Bejarano v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202219-72943California789 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FRANCISCO ANTONIO NORIEGA- No. 19-72943 BEJARANO, AKA Francisco Antonio Bejarano, AKA Antonio Rodriguez- Agency No. A205-931-030 Huerta, AKA Antonio Rodriguez-Vuelta,

Petitioner, MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,*** S.R. THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Francisco Noriega-Bejarano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.