Esperanza Ellis v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202218-71615California812 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESPERANZA ESTRADA ELLIS, AKA No. 18-71615 Esparanza Lapitan Estrada, Agency No. A200-158-992 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: HAWKINS, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Esperanza Estrada Ellis petitions for review of the agency’s order

finding her removable on the basis of having committed a crime involving moral

turpitude. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. Removability. Petitioner argues she was improperly charged as

removable because the agency erroneously…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.