Cynthia Wills v. First Republic Bank

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202219-17001California688 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CYNTHIA S. WILLS, No. 19-17001

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-01819-NC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FIRST REPUBLIC BANK,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 7, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,*** District Judge.

Cynthia Wills appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice the

breach-of-contract and negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) claims

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. raised in her first amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.