Curtis Chun v. City and County of Honolulu

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CURTIS CHUN, No. 20-16558

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00131-JMS-RT v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee,

and

JOHN DOES, 1-10; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii J. Michael Seabright, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 16, 2022** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: HAWKINS, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Curtis Chun appeals the adverse grant of summary judgment in his

employment discrimination action under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the

Hawaii Whistleblower Protection Act (“HWPA”) against the City and County of

Honolulu (the “City”). We have jurisdiction under…