Andres Acosta Cabezas v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202220-71257California481 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 18 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRES ACOSTA CABEZAS, No. 20-71257

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-927-368

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. Andres Acosta Cabezas (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) dismissal of

his untimely appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for

asylum, withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.