Yingfeng Miao v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202218-73309California460 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 22 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YINGFENG MIAO, No. 18-73309

Petitioner, Agency No. A087-718-853

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 17, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. Petitioner Yingfeng Miao (“Miao”) petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) dismissal of her appeal from an Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

Miao entered the United States in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.