United States v. Robert Hanrahan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202221-10179California237 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10179

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00119-WBS-

v.

ROBERT HANRAHAN, AKA Bubba, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Robert Hanrahan appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion to clarify the amended judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hanrahan does not dispute that the amended judgment reduced his federal

sentence by the time he served on his state sentence to effectuate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.