United States v. Robert Hanrahan
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202221-10179California237 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10179
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00119-WBS-
v.
ROBERT HANRAHAN, AKA Bubba, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Robert Hanrahan appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion to clarify the amended judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hanrahan does not dispute that the amended judgment reduced his federal
sentence by the time he served on his state sentence to effectuate the…