Rudolph Ellis, Jr. v. Ralph Diaz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202221-15265California419 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUDOLPH ELLIS, Jr., No. 21-15265

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00134-DAD-EPG

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of Corrections,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Rudolph Ellis, Jr. appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Watison v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.