Robert Mead v. Carolyn Williams

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT M. MEAD, No. 21-15368

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00578-DB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CAROLYN INEZ WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Deborah L. Barnes, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted February 15, 2022***

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Robert M. Mead appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting

defendant’s post-judgment motion in Mead’s action alleging federal and state law

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In its order, the district court clarified…