Ramon Yanez-Lopez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202220-70539California420 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAMON YANEZ-LOPEZ, No. 20-70539

Petitioner, Agency No. A037-727-096

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 17, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,*** District Judge.

Ramon Yanez-Lopez, a citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying his request for sua sponte reopening

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. of his immigration proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and

may review only for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.