Nicholas Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202221-15801California886 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 22 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICHOLAS HONCHARIW, Trustee, No. 21-15801 Honchariw Family Trust, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 1:16-cv-01183-DAD-BAM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; BOARD

OF SUPERVISORS OF COUNTY OF

STANISLAUS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2022** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Plaintiff Nicholas Honchariw appeals from the district court’s grant of

judgment on the pleadings to Defendants County of Stanislaus (“County”) and

Board of Supervisors of County of Stanislaus (“Board”). Plaintiff claims that the

Board effected a taking of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.