Nicholas Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202221-15801California886 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 22 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NICHOLAS HONCHARIW, Trustee, No. 21-15801 Honchariw Family Trust, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 1:16-cv-01183-DAD-BAM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF COUNTY OF
STANISLAUS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 17, 2022** San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.
Plaintiff Nicholas Honchariw appeals from the district court’s grant of
judgment on the pleadings to Defendants County of Stanislaus (“County”) and
Board of Supervisors of County of Stanislaus (“Board”). Plaintiff claims that the