Bin Seang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202220-72532California390 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIN SEANG, No. 20-72532

Petitioner, Agency No. A209-394-126

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 17, 2022** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: HAWKINS, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Bin Seang (“Seang”) seeks review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) adverse

credibility determination and denial of his applications for asylum and withholding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of removal. We review for substantial evidence, see Wang v. Sessions, 861 F.3d

1003, 1007 (9th Cir. 2017), and deny the petition.

The IJ’s adverse credibility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.