Bin Seang v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202220-72532California390 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BIN SEANG, No. 20-72532
Petitioner, Agency No. A209-394-126
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 17, 2022** Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: HAWKINS, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Bin Seang (“Seang”) seeks review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) adverse
credibility determination and denial of his applications for asylum and withholding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of removal. We review for substantial evidence, see Wang v. Sessions, 861 F.3d
1003, 1007 (9th Cir. 2017), and deny the petition.