Ari Martinez-Macario v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 22, 202215-72615California393 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARI ADELFO MARTINEZ-MACARIO, No. 15-72615

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-201-854

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Ari Adelfo Martinez-Macario, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from

an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Martinez-Macario’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.