Residents for Orcutt Sensible Growth v. County of Santa Barbara CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 2022B311991California4,900 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 2/22/22 Residents for Orcutt Sensible Growth v. County of Santa Barbara

CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

Calif ornia Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties f rom citing or relying on opinions not certif ied f or publication or ordered published, except as specif ied by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certif ied f or publication or ordered published f or purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

RESIDENTS FOR ORCUTT 2d Civil No. B311991 SENSIBLE GROWTH, et al., (Super. Ct. No. 19CV06707) (Santa Barbara County) Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

COUNTY OF SANTA

BARBARA, et al.,

Defendants and Respondents,

MOJO KS2, LLC,

Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.), Residents for Orcutt Sensible Growth and Gina Lord-Garland (appellants) brought an action challenging the approval of a new retail commercial center in Orcutt, an unincorporated area in the County of Santa Barbara…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.