People v. Anderson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 2022C091643California3,963 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

Filed 2/22/22 P. v. Anderson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

THE PEOPLE, C091643

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. P19CRF0020)

v.

SHANNON LEE ANDERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Shannon Lee Anderson guilty of making criminal threats. On appeal, defendant asserts the conviction should be reversed because: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support various elements of the offense; and (2) the trial court abused its discretion under Evidence Code section 352 when it admitted a text message into evidence. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I The Charges, Verdicts, And Sentencing Defendant was charged with: (1) making criminal threats…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.