Hudson

Hudson v. McSherry & Hudson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 2022D079476California4,790 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/22/22 Hudson v. McSherry & Hudson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

Calif ornia Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties f rom citing or relying on opinions not certif ied f or publication or ordered published, except as specif ied by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certif ied f or publication or or dered published f or purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK R. HUDSON III, D079476

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 18CV01818)

MCSHERRY & HUDSON et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz, John Gallagher, Judge. Affirmed. Strong Appellate Law, Jeanine G. Strong; JRG Attorneys at Law, and Robert E. Rosenthal for Plaintiff and Appellant. The Grunsky Law Firm, Thomas N. Griffin, and Cheryl L. Ferguson for Defendants and Respondents.

Appellant Frederick R. Hudson III is the former partner of respondents David Bachan and Steven Duke in an insurance brokerage firm. The parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.