Hall

People v. Hall

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 2022E072463ACalifornia4,366 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

A. Robbery of Ismael

Around midnight on February 7, 2015, Ismael D. was outside his home when he

noticed a black Chevy Silverado driving by at an unusually slow pace. Ismael asked the

driver if he could help him and, after a brief exchange, the driver got out of the truck,

showed Ismael his gun, and asked him if he knew anyone from a local gang called

“Cathedral City.” When Ishmael said no, Hall and his 14-year-old codefendant, Anthony

Torres, stepped out of the truck.1 Torres demanded Ismael empty his pockets, and Hall

1Torres is not a party to this appeal. Though he initially filed an appeal raising the same argument about CALCRIM No. 315 as Hall, he abandoned his challenge after our Supreme Court issued their decision in People v. Lemcke, supra, 11 Cal.5th 644, which we discuss in part II.A, below.

3 hit him in the face with a rifle. More people got out of the truck then, all armed with

weapons.

Ismael emptied his pockets and handed over his belongings, and the group began

to beat him. When his wife noticed what was happening, she yelled through the window

that she was calling the police. The group got back into the truck and fled.

B. Home Invasion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.