B. R. v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
26 F.4th 827
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202219-70386California9,310 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bea, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

B.R., No. 19-70386 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A200-822-829

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ORDER AND Respondent. OPINION

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2021 San Francisco, California

Filed February 23, 2022

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Lee H. Rosenthal, * District Judge.

Order; Opinion by Judge Bea

* The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **

Immigration

The panel filed: 1) an order granting Respondent’s petition for panel rehearing, withdrawing the opinion filed July 12, 2021, replacing that opinion with a superseding opinion, and denying as moot the petition for rehearing en banc; and 2) a superseding opinion denying in part and granting in part B.R’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, and remanding. In the superseding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.