Aminpour

Aminpour v. Fulkerson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2022D078288California6,422 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/23/22 Aminpour v. Fulkerson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ASHKAN KING AMINPOUR et al., D078288

Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2018- v. 00054834-CU-BT-CTL)

DAN FULKERSON et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel R. Wohlfeil, Judge. Affirmed. Pettit Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin, Douglas A. Pettit, and Caitlin M. Jones for Defendants and Appellants. Higgs Fletcher & Mack, Paul Pfingst, Susan M. Hack; Shoecraft Burton, Robert D. Shoecraft; Khashayar Law Group, Daryoosh Khashayar, and Taylor Marks for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents. Dan Fulkerson and Paul Batta appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.