Dow

Dow v. Lassen Irrigation Company

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2022C091965California5,009 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/23/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Lassen) ----

JAY DOW, as Trustee, etc., C091965

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 4573)

v. OPINION ON MOTION

TO DISMISS

LASSEN IRRIGATION COMPANY et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Lassen County, Leonard J. LaCasse, Judge. (Retired Judge of the Mendocino Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.)

Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Scott A. Morris and William T. Chisum, for Defendant and Appellant, Lassen Irrigation Company.

Best & Krieger, Gene Tanaka, Steve M. Anderson, and Emily S. Chaidez, for Defendant and Appellant, Honey Lake Valley Resource Conservation District.

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck and Bradley J. Herrema, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

The right to appeal is purely statutory, since neither the federal Constitution nor state Constitution provides for it. (People v. Berkowitz (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 671, 676.) In civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.