Kirk

Kirk v. Ratner

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2022B309880MCalifornia5,415 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/23/22 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

CHARLOTTE KIRK et al., B309880

Plaintiffs and (Los Angeles County Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 20STCP02842)

v. ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND DENYING

BRETT RATNER et al., REHEARING [No change in the appellate Defendants and judgment] Respondents.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 10, 2022 be modified as follows:

At the bottom of page 7 and continuing to the top of page 8, delete the language that now reads:

because Marshall, although a signatory of the Duchess Agreement, was not a party to the settlement agreement and could not be compelled to arbitrate any disputes with the executives. and replace it with the following language:

because Marshall was not a party to the settlement agreement or a signatory to any other agreement with the executives and could not be compelled to arbitrate any disputes with them. There is no change in the appellate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.