United States v. Leandro Gomez, III

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202221-10113California687 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10113

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:05-cr-00300-JMS-1 v.

LEANDRO GOMEZ III, AKA Leo, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii J. Michael Seabright, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2022** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: HAWKINS, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

The district court denied the Motion for Compassionate Release brought by

Defendant Leandro Gomez, III. On appeal, Gomez argues that the district court erred

by: (1) failing to consider each argument he raised in support of release, either

separately or in combination; (2) requiring him to prove he suffered an “enormous”

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.